Latin American Results:
The relation between the quality of school resources and student performance in math, reading and science shows that resource quality has the most impact in rural regions because the slope of the rural line is steeper than the urban. Both lines show a positive correlation between improved resource quality and educational performance.
The relation between the quality of school resources and student performance in math, reading and science shows that resource quality has the most impact in rural regions because the slope of the rural line is steeper than the urban. Both lines show a positive correlation between improved resource quality and educational performance.
By country:
We confirm the correlation between resource quality and its impact on rural regions. There are some slightly differences among countries in terms of the gap, but in general resource quality has more impact on rural than urban areas. The only case in which the impact of school resource quality is greater in urban areas is Argentina.
We confirm the correlation between resource quality and its impact on rural regions. There are some slightly differences among countries in terms of the gap, but in general resource quality has more impact on rural than urban areas. The only case in which the impact of school resource quality is greater in urban areas is Argentina.